Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Acute Peritonitis
HTML

Keywords

acute peritonitis
postoperative complications
prediction

How to Cite

Grynchuk, A. F., Grynchuk, F. V., & Polianskiy, I. Y. (2016). Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Acute Peritonitis. Galician Medical Journal, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2016.3.10

Abstract

The ability to predict the possibility of postoperative complications is an important component of treatment of acute peritonitis. None of the known methods is fully accepted worldwide.

The objective of the research was to develop an informative method for predicting postoperative complications.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of treating 169 patients with peritonitis was made. 79 patients developed postoperative complications. 39 patients died.  123 patients were diagnosed with comorbidities. Clinical and laboratory data, parameters of the Mannheim peritonitis index, comorbidity class, and the patients’ age were analyzed using the variance analysis.

Results and discussion. The prediction of postoperative complications may be carried out in two stages. Prior to surgery, preceding risk is estimated considering the nature of the underlying disease, clinical signs of acute peritonitis and comorbidity class. During surgery the final risk estimation is made taking into consideration the nature of the underlying disease, the Mannheim peritonitis index, comorbidity class, the number of band forms, use of the programmed peritoneal sanation. For each aforementioned indicator different number of points was determined. Patients were divided into several groups by the sum of these points: normal (2-4 points), increased (5.7 points), medium (8-9 points) and high (more than 10 points) risk of postoperative complications.

Conclusions.

  1. The proposed prognostic scale allows us to identify groups of normal, increased, medium and high risk of postoperative complications in acute peritonitis.
  2. A two-phase prediction - before and during surgery – allow us to differentially apply preventive measures in the preoperative preparation, during surgery and in the postoperative period of treatment.
https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2016.3.10
HTML

References

Pryhidko RA. Prognozuvannya rozvytku hniino-zapalnykh uskladnen pry hostrii intraabdominalnii patolohii. Aktual probl suchasn med: Visn Ukr med stomat acad. 2015;15(2):127-129. Ukrainian

Grynchuk FV, Polianskiy IYu, Preutesei VV, Grynchuk AF. New scoring system for predicting postsurgical complications in abdominal surgery. Arta medica. 2015;3(56):53-54.

Kryvoruchko IA, Ivanova YuV, Povelichenko MS, Andreeschev SA. Khirurhichne likuvannia khvorykh na abdominalnyi sepsis z vykorystanniam skoryngovykh system otsinky tiazhkosti khvorykh. Arkh klinich med. 2014;2(2):68-71. Ukrainian

Ott K, Heger U. Are There Gender-Specific Differences in Complications Following Abdominal Surgery. Zentralbl Chir. 2015;140(3):273-278. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545824

Torba M, Gjata A, Buci S, Bushi G, Zenelaj A, Kajo I, Koceku S, Kagjini K, Subashi K. The influence of the risk factor on the abdominal complications in colon injury management. G Chir. 2015;36(2):57-62. http://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2015.36.2.057

Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Streifensand RA, Gundlach E. Der Mannheimer Peritonitis – Index. Chirurg. 1987;58(2):84-92. German PMid:3568820

Grynchuk FV, Polianskiy IYu. A new scoring system for comorbidity assessment in urgent abdominal surgery. Arta medica. 2015;3(56):52-53.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.