Abstract
In the problem of solving diagnosis and treatment of hard tissue defects, a significant role is played by the choice of tactics for dental treatment of tooth decay. This work was aimed at studying the problem of diagnosis and systematization of hard tissues defects, that will contribute to the objectification of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in dental treatment of patients with this disease.
The objective of the research was to develop an anatomical and functional systematization for differentiated evaluation of tooth defects, as a basis for the application of differentiated diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to dental treatment of hard tissue defects.
Materials and methods. For differential assessment of the extent of tooth defects and precise estimation of the strength of the composition “tooth-restoration”, we conducted mechanical and mathematical modeling of contact interaction of restoration with dental tissues. We conducted anthropometric studies of all types of cavities of different groups of teeth as well.
Results. As a result of the study, there was proposed the systematization of hard tissues defects – location of defects, occlusive load, extent of defects/ depth of decay. The algorithm for choosing the method of treating hard tissues defects that is based on the systematization of location of defects, occlusive load, extent of defects/ depth of decay and may serve as a selection criterion for the treatment of such pathologies was offered.
Conclusions. The proposed systematization filled the obvious gap in academic ideas of hard tissue defects, suggested the prospect of reaching a consensus on differentiated diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in treatment of patients with this disease building the methodological “bridge of continuity” between therapeutic and orthopedic dentistry in the field of hard tissue defect treatment.
References
Nikolaev AI. Sistemnyy podkhod k diagnostike i kompleksnomu lecheniyu karioznykh i prisheyechnykh nekarioznykh porazheniy tverdykh tkaney zubov: kliniko-laboratornoye issledovaniye [avtoreferat]. Smolensk; c2012. 37p.
Abolmasov NG, Abolmasov NN, Serdyukov MS. Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; c2018. 556p.
Zarow MD, Arcangelo C, Paolone G, Paniz G, Felipe L. EndoProsthodontics – Guidelines for the clinical practice. Chicago: Quintessence Int; 2016. [PMCid:PMC4799714]
Mount GJ, Hume WR. A new cavity classification. Aust Dent J. 1998;43(3):153-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00156.x [PMid:9707777]
Bulbuk OI, Hrynishak EB, Bulbuk OV. Sposib vyznachennia obiemu defektiv tverdykh tkanyn zubiv. Ukrainian patent UA 51592. 2010 July 26.
Lasfargues JJ, Kaleka R, Louis JJ. Le concept SISTA. Un nouveau guide thrapeutique en cariologie. Real Clin. 2000;11:103-122.
Bulbuk OV, Rozhko MM. Optimization of diagnostic process in assessing the extent of dental hard tissue defects after endodontic treatment. Galician Medical Journal. 2016;23(4):07-09.
Bulbuk O, Rozhko M, Bulbuk O. Classification of defects hard tissue located in the gingival part of any tooth. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2017;6(6):33-35.
Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M et al. Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(1):e74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0074
Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S et al. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018;69:70-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.008
Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2:86-96.
Rocca GT, Rizcalla NI, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Concepts and evidence-based procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines from cavity’s preparation to final restoration. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;3:370-392.
Zaruba M, Gohring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:317-324. Epub 2012 Sep 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.680905
Paolone G, Saracinelli M, Devoto W, Putignano A. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8(1):44-67 [PMid:23390620]
D'Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8
Sande FH, Collares K, Correa MB et al. Restoration survival: revisiting patients' risk factors through a systematic literature review. Oper Dent. 2016;41(7):7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/15-120-LIT
Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Oper Dent. 2016;41(7):48-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/15-058-O
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.