This paper presents the possibilities of Mendeley – a reference manager and social network for researchers.
The key aspects of using this software as an effective reference manager as well as a tool for organizing full-text archive of publications and processing scientific sources when conducting research are highlighted. The possibilities of Mendeley as a social network, namely a means of communication and collaboration between researchers, sharing of reference database and search for new scientific publications are presented as well.
In general, Mendeley, due to its functionality, is an integral part of the scientific research carried out by students, scientists or laboratory research groups. The use of Mendeley by all members of the research project will allow them to effectively search for original sources and analyze them; to quickly create the reference list according to different styles; to follow other researchers in order to view relevant papers; to greatly enhance the quality of the research; to expand the potential readership of their publications.
Torraco RJ. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4:356–367. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Jane Webster RTW. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Q. 2002;26:xiii–xxiii
May RM. Science as organized scepticism. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011;369:4685–4689. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0177
Tykhonkova I. References are the important indicator of articles` quality. How to escape an extra work. Ukr Sci Glob Inf Sp. 2015;100–106. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4176.5842
Pautasso M. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003149 DOI: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
Rapple C. The role of the critical review article in alleviating information overload. Annu Rev. 2011 [cited September 24, 2016]. http://www.annualreviews.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1300384004941/Annual_Reviews_WhitePaper_Web_2011.pdf.
Ketcham CM, Crawford JM. The impact of review articles. Lab Investig. 2007;87:1174–1185. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700688
Vaidhyanathan V, Moore M, Loper KA, Van Schaik J, Goolabsingh D. Making Bibliographic Researchers More Efficient: Tools for Organizing and Downloading PDFs, Part 1. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2012;9:47–55. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2012.651576
Zhang Y. Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31:45–60. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.641841
Butros A, Taylor S. Managing information: evaluating and selecting citation management software, a look at EndNote, RefWorks, Mendeley and Zotero. In: Netting knowledge: two hemispheres/one world: proceedings of the 36th IAMSLIC Annual Conference. 2010. p. 17–21
Hicks A. “ Mendeley ”: A Review. Collab Librariansh. 2011;3:127–128
Reiswig J. Mendeley. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:193–194. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.021
Shevchuk M. DSTU GOST 7.1:2006. 2011 [cited September 26, 2016]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/orgchemister/home/dstu-gost-7-1-2006.
Singh J. Mendeley: A free research management tool for desktop and web. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1:62 DOI: http://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.64539
Zaugg H, Tateishi I, Randall DL, West RE. Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration. TechTrends. 2011;55:32–36. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0467-y
Giglia E. Academic social networks: it’s time to change the way we do research. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47:345–349
MacMillan D. Mendeley: teaching scholarly communication and collaboration through social networking. Libr Manag. 2012;33:561–569. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279902
Atkinson-Bonasio A. Mendeley’s integration with Scopus and ScienceDirect. 2013 [cited September 24, 2016]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/mendeleys-integration-with-scopus-and-sciencedirect
Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65:1627–1638. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.