Introduction. Computed tomography is more accurate than excretory urography in evaluation of renal stones due to its high sensitivity and temporal resolution; it permits sub-millimetric evaluation of the size and site of calculi but cannot evaluate their chemical composition. Dual-energy computed tomography allows evaluating the chemical composition of urinary calculi using simultaneous image acquisition at two different energy levels.
The objective of the research was to determine renal stone composition using dual-energy multidetector computed tomography, and its correlation with post-extraction chemical analysis of stones.
Materials and Methods. This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging from September 2017 to March 2019. A total of 50 patients with urolithiasis at the age of 18-70 years were included in the study. Dual-energy computed tomography ratios of various stones were noted, and preoperative composition of calculi was given based on their colour and dual-energy computed tomography ratio. These results were compared with the post-extraction chemical analysis of stones (using Fourier infrared transform spectroscopy as the standard comparative method.)
Results. The most common type of calculi in our study population was calcium oxalate stones (78%) followed by uric acid stones (12%), cystine stones (6%) and hydroxyapatite stones (4%). The dual-energy ratio of calcium oxalate, uric acid, cystine and hydroxyapatite stones ranged from 1.38-1.59, 0.94-1.08, and 1.20-1.28 and 1.52-1.57, respectively, with the mean dual-energy ratio of 1.43, 1.01, 1.25 and 1.55, respectively. Dual-energy computed tomography was found to be 100% sensitive and specific for differentiating uric acid stones from non‑uric acid stones. The sensitivity and specificity in differentiating calcium oxalate calculus from non‑calcium oxalate calculus was 97.5% and 90.9%, respectively, with 96% accuracy and kappa value of 0.883 suggesting strong agreement.
Conclusions. Dual-energy computed tomography is highly sensitive and accurate in distinguishing between various types of renal calculi. It has vital role in management as uric acid calculi are amenable to drug treatment, while most of non-uric acid calculi require surgical intervention.
Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2010;31(4):315–320. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2010.05.002
Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, Melton LJ, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ. The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2014;25(12):2878–2886. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013091011
López M, Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatric Nephrology. 2010;25(1):49–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-008-0960-5
Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Wang K, Li H, et al. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian Journal of Urology. 2018;5(4):205–214. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.007
Konjengbam H, Meitei SY. Association of kidney stone disease with dietary factors: a review. Anthropological Review. 2020;83(1):65–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0005
Thongprayoon C, Krambeck AE, Rule AD. Determining the true burden of kidney stone disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2020;16(12):736–746. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0320-7
Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON, et al. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy ct: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology. 2010;257(2):394–401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100249
Tanaka M, Yokota E, Toyonaga Y, Shimizu F, Ishii Y, Fujime M, et al. Stone attenuation value and cross-sectional area on computed tomography predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy. Korean Journal of Urology. 2013;54(7):454. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.7.454
Dawoud MM, Dewan KAAWA, Zaki SA, Sabae MAA-R. Role of dual energy computed tomography in management of different renal stones. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2017;48(3):717–727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.020
Williams JC, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE. Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2003;61(6):1092–1096. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00349-2
Primak AN, Giraldo JCR, Eusemann CD, Schmidt B, Kantor B, Fletcher JG, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195(5):1164–1174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3956
Li Z-X, Jiao G-L, Zhou S-M, Cheng ZY, Bashir S, Zhou Y. Evaluation of the chemical composition of nephrolithiasis using dual-energy CT in Southern Chinese gout patients. BMC Nephrology. 2019;20(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1441-8
Basha MAA, AlAzzazy MZ, Enaba MM. Diagnostic validity of dual-energy CT in determination of urolithiasis chemical composition: In vivo analysis. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2018;49(2):499–508. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.12.018
Ilyas M, Dev G, Gupta A, Bhat T, Sharma S. Dual-energy computed tomography: A reliable and established tool for in vivo differentiation of uric acid from nonuric acid renal Stones. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2018;25(1):52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_24_18
Stolzmann P, Kozomara M, Chuck N, Müntener M, Leschka S, Scheffel H, et al. In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients. Abdominal Imaging. 2009;35(5):629–635. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9569-9
Ahn SH, Oh TH, Seo IY. Can a dual-energy computed tomography predict unsuitable stone components for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Korean Journal of Urology. 2015;56(9):644. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.644
Ferrandino MN, Pierre SA, Simmons WN, Paulson EK, Albala DM, Preminger GM. First prize (Tie): dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing: improved determination of urinary stone composition. Journal of Endourology. 2010;24(3):347–354. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0193
Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Rentsch K, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation. Urological Research. 2008;36(3-4):133–138. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-008-0140-x
Hartman R, Kawashima A, Takahashi N, Silva A, Vrtiska T, Leng S, et al. Applications of dual-energy CT in urologic imaging: an update. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 2012;50(2):191–205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2012.02.007
Cheng PM, Moin P, Dunn MD, Boswell WD, Duddalwar VA. What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 2??? CT findings, reporting, and treatment. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;198(6):W548–W554. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8462
Duan X, Li Z, Yu L, Leng S, Halaweish AF, Fletcher JG, et al. Characterization of urinary stone composition by use of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT with increased spectral separation. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;205(6):1203–1207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14348
Graser A, Johnson TRC, Bader M, Staehler M, Haseke N, Nikolaou K, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Investigative Radiology. 2008;43(2):112–119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318157a144
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.