Often when discussing what is considered a rarer occurring event, individuals reference the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon as insurance against fallacious thinking. Also known as the frequency bias, this logical heuristic states that rare occurring events are rare and the knowledge of the existence of rare occurrences makes the interlocutor more likely to search out the event or see it occur more frequently. These false increases in observation frequency can logically be blamed, at least in part, on the interlocutor being made aware of the event existence. This Baader-Meinhof logical heuristic is often mis-utilized in the sciences to minimize the chances of rarer phenomena from being considered within a logical framework for the work up of a problem. This article presents a new logical heuristic, the “Mongoose Phenomenon” as a counter argument and presents it in the context of the fields of medicine, the hard sciences, engineering, and philosophy. It is the intention of the authors that this logical heuristic be utilized to improve the thought process of scientists, clinicians, and others to ensure the best thought process for the work up and creation of a solution for problems.
Callaghan B. The Barbados Mongoose [Internet]. Totally Barbados. 2017 [cited 2022 March 7]. Available from: https://www.totallybarbados.com/articles/animals/barbados-mongoose/
Shem S. The house of God. New York: Berkley Books; 2010.
Viendyasari M. Application of ‘KISS’ principle on marketing mix strategy (Firmax3 product through network marketing in Indonesia): case study. KnE Social Sciences. 2018;3(11):56-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i11.2750
Wood J. Keep it simple, stupid! Materials Today. 2006;9(10):1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71634-0
Purohit K. The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon in radiology. Academic Radiology. 2019;26(6):e127. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.025
Kolli S, Dang-Ho KP, Mori A, Gurram K. The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon of Dieulafoy’s lesion. Cureus. 2019;11(5):e4595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4595
Pang J-MB, Gorringe KL, Fox SB. Reply to the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Histopathology. 2016;69(3):523–524. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12968
Van Bockstal M, Libbrecht L, Floris G, Lambein K. The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Histopathology. 2016;69(3):522–523. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12977
Boening A, Burger H. “If You Hear Hoof Beats, Think Horses, Not Zebras.” The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports. 2018;07(01):e35–e35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660808
Sohatee MA. A case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma: when you hear hoof beats, sometimes consider zebras, not horses. Case Reports. 2009;2009(sep15 1):bcr0520091853. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr.05.2009.1853
Smith CS, Paauw DS. When you hear hoof beats: four principles for separating zebras from horses. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2000;13(6):424–429. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3122/15572625-13-6-424
Miller WT. Letter from the editor: Occam versus Hickam. Seminars in Roentgenology. 1998;33(3):213. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-198X(98)80001-1
Zarghami Esfanhani N, Wundes A, Varkey T, Lisak RP, Goodman A, Graves J, et al. Encephalitis and myelitis in a young woman. Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation. 2021;8(5):e1026. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001026
Cahalan S. Brain on fire: my month of madness. Harlow, England: Penguin Books; 2014.
Hawkes CH, Giovannoni G, Lechner-Scott J, Levy M. Is the incidence of multiple sclerosis really increasing? Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2020;45:102527. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102527
Kaunzner UW, Gauthier SA. MRI in the assessment and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update on best practice. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders. 2017;10(6):247–261. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285617708911
Thomas R, Sanders S, Doust J, Beller E, Glasziou P. Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e994–e1001. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3482
Young S, Moss D, Sedgwick O, Fridman M, Hodgkins P. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in incarcerated populations. Psychological Medicine. 2014;45(2):247–258. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000762
Chan KY, Zhao F, Meng S, Demaio AR, Reed C, Theodoratou E, et al. Urbanization and the prevalence of schizophrenia in China between 1990 and 2010. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(2):251–252. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20222
Torrey EF. Prevalence studies in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;150(5):598–608. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.5.598
Matson JL, Kozlowski AM. The increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2011;5(1):418–425. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.004
Holden RJ. People or systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer. Professional Safety. 2009;54(12):34-41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21694753/
Dhillon BS. Human errors: A review. Microelectronics Reliability. 1989;29(3):299–304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(89)90612-4
Plant RR, Quinlan PT. Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2013;13(3):598–614. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0166-6
Pelanne CM. Discussion on experiments to separate the "effect of thickness" from systematic equipment errors in thermal transmission measurements. Thermal Insulation Performance. ASTM International. 1980.
Church RM, Crystal JD, Collyer CE. Correction of errors in scientific research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 1996;28(2):305–310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204787
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533(7604):452–454. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
Mlinarić A, Horvat M, Šupak Smolčić V. Dealing with the positive publication bias: why you should really publish your negative results. Biochemia Medica. 2017;27(3):030201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030201
Echevarría L, Malerba A, Arechavala-Gomeza V. Researcher’s perceptions on publishing “negative” results and open access. Nucleic Acid Therapeutics. 2021;31(3):185–189. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2020.0865
Tan S, Tatsumura Y. Alexander Fleming (1881–1955): Discoverer of penicillin. Singapore Medical Journal. 2015;56(07):366–367. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2015105
Gaynes R. The discovery of penicillin—new insights after more than 75 years of clinical use. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2017;23(5):849–853. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2305.161556
West TG. Plato's apology of Socrates: An interpretation, with a new translation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1979.
Kiss O. Heuristic, methodology or logic of discovery? lakatos on patterns of thinking. Perspectives on Science. 2006;14(3):302–317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2006.14.3.302
Hertwig R, Pachur T. Heuristics, History of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2015;829–835. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03221-9
Doyle AC. His last bow: some reminiscences of Sherlock Holmes. Oxford, England: Oxford Paperbacks; 1994.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.