Styloid Process: What Length Is Abnormal?
PDF
XML
Full Text

Keywords

Styloid Process
Computed Tomography
Eagle's Syndrome
Shaded Surface Display

How to Cite

Shah, O., Shera, F., Choh, N., Gojwari, T., Shafi, F., Suhail, J., & Rafiq, M. (2021). Styloid Process: What Length Is Abnormal?. Galician Medical Journal, 28(1), E202114. https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2021.1.4

Abstract

The length of the styloid process varies greatly in different populations and depends on ethnicity and geographical background. The elongated styloid process may be associated with Eagle’s syndrome. Therefore, the mean normal length of the styloid process in different population groups needs to be calculated and the upper cutoff limit for elongated styloid process should be found.

The objective of the research was to evaluate the styloid process length in the Kashmiri population using multidetector computed tomography.

Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 304 patients who underwent computed tomography of the head and paranasal sinuses, and the mean styloid process length was calculated on both sides. The mean of three measurements of styloid process length was taken. The study population was grouped as follows: Group I included patients at the age of 21-30 years; Group II comprised patients at the age of 31-40 years; Group III included 68 patients at the age of 41-50 years; Group IV comprised patients > 50 years old.

Results. The mean length of the styloid process in the studied population varied from 20 to 51 mm (mean 31.3 ± 4.5 mm). There was no significant difference in the length on both sides (p=0.835). The mean length of the styloid process was 30.1 ± 4.2 mm in females and 32.3 ± 4.8 mm in males (p< 0.034). The lengths of the styloid process in different age groups were as follows: in Group I - 30.9 ± 4.4 mm; in Group II - 31.2 ± 4.8 mm; in Group III - 31.6 ± 4.3 mm; in Group IV - 31.5 ± 4.5 mm.

Conclusions. The mean length of the styloid process in our population was higher as compared to many other ethnic groups. The styloid process in males was longer. The elongated styloid process on computed tomography scan should not be labeled as Eagle’s syndrome unless clinical symptoms are present.

https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2021.1.4
PDF
XML
Full Text

References

Yavuz H, Caylakli F, Yildirim T, Ozluoglu LN. Angulation of the styloid process in Eagle’s syndrome. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology [Internet]. 2008 Apr 22;265(11):1393–1396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0686-9

Fusco DJ, Asteraki S, Spetzler RF. Eagle’s syndrome: embryology, anatomy, and clinical management. Acta Neurochirurgica [Internet]. 2012 May 26;154(7):1119–1126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1385-2

Chourdia V. Elongated styloid process (Eagle’s syndrome) & severe headache. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002 Jul;54(3):238-241. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23119903

Ozdemir MB, Okunak M, Koseler A, Simsek C, Atalay E, Yonauc GN. An ancient anatomic variation: bilateral elongated styloid process of cranium. Ital J Anat Embryol [Internet]. 2013 Jul;118(2):184-188. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25338408

Başekim CÇ, Mutlu H, Güngör A, Şilit E, Pekkafali Z, Kutlay M, et al. Evaluation of styloid process by three-dimensional computed tomography. European Radiology [Internet]. 2004 Jun 19;15(1):134–139. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2354-9

Sudhakara Reddy R, Sai Kiran C, Sai Madhavi N, Raghavendra M, Satish A. Prevalence of elongation and calcification patterns of elongated styloid process in south India. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry [Internet]. 2013;5(1):e30–e35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50981

Last RJ, McMinn RHM. Last's anatomy, regional and applied. 9th ed. Edinburgh ; New York : Churchill Livingstone; 1994.

Patil S, Ghosh S, Vasudeva N. Morphometric Study of the Styloid Process of Temporal Bone. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [Internet]. 2014;8(9):AC04-AC06. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9419.4867

Bozkir MG, Boga H, Dere F. The Evaluation of Elongated Styloid Process in Panoramic Radiographs in Edentulous Patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 1999;29:481-485. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/129820

Gözil R, Yener N, Çalgüner E, Araç M, Tunç E, Bahcelioğlu M. Morphological characteristics of styloid process evaluated by computerized axial tomography. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger [Internet]. 2001 Nov;183(6):527–535. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(01)80060-1

Ramadan SU, Gokharman D, Tunçbilek I, Kacar M, Koşar P, Kosar U. Assessment of the stylohoid chain by 3D-CT. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy [Internet]. 2007 Jul 27;29(7):583–588. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0239-8

Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging. Fourth edition. Mosby; 2003. 2322 p.

Suzuki Y, Toma N, Kuroda Y, Miura Y, Shiba M, Yasuda R, et al. Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Formation as Eagle Jugular Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review. World Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2020 Dec;144:154–161. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.214

Langlais R, Langland O, Nortje C. Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

Guimarães SMR, Carvalho ACP, Guimarães JP, Gomes MB, Cardoso M de MM, Reis HN. Prevalência de alteração morfológica do processo estilóide em pacientes com desordem temporomandibular. Radiologia Brasileira [Internet]. 2006 Dec;39(6):407–411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842006000600007

Shimizu T, Yokoo S, Takayama Y, Musha A, Ogawa M, Makiguchi T. Elongated Styloid Process With Skeletal Mandibular Protrusion. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2020 Dec 9;Publish Ahead of Print. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007298

Ravisankar M, Murugesan GS. Evaluation of Eagle’s Syndrome and Assessment of Post-operative Outcome of Excision of Elongated Styloid Process: A Prospective Study, in Tertiary Care Centre, India. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery [Internet]. 2020 Nov 16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02255-4

Govindarajalu P, Sharma Y, Parsana M. Paratonsilar Approach to Styloid Process in Eagle’s Syndrome—A Retrospective Analysis. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02183-3

Rizzo-Riera E, Rubi-Oña C, García-Wagner M, Costa AA-D, Miralles J, Enchev E, et al. Advanced Robotic Surgery of the Parapharyngeal Space. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2020;31(8):2339-2341. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006804

Cullu N, Deveer M, Sahan M, Tetiker H, Yilmaz M. Radiological evaluation of the styloid process length in the normal population. Folia Morphol (Warsz) [Internet]. 2013 Dec 4;72(4):318-321. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.2013.0053

Ekici F, Tekbas G, Hamidi C, Onder H, Goya C, Cetincakmak MG, et al. The distribution of stylohyoid chain anatomic variations by age groups and gender: an analysis using MDCT. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology [Internet]. 2012 Oct 7;270(5):1715–1720. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2202-5

Yetiser S, Gerek M, Ozkaptan Y. Elongated Styloid Process: Diagnostic Problems Related to Symptomatology. CRANIO® [Internet]. 1997 Jul;15(3):236–241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1997.11746017

Yavuz H, Caylakli F, Yildirim T, Ozluoglu LN. Angulation of the styloid process in Eagle’s syndrome. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology [Internet]. 2008 Apr 22;265(11):1393–1396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0686-9

Jung T, Tschernitschek H, Hippen H, Schneider B, Borchers L. Elongated styloid process: when is it really elongated? Dentomaxillofacial Radiology [Internet]. 2004 Mar;33(2):119–124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13491574

EAGLE WW. Elongated Styloid Process: Symptoms and Treatment. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery [Internet]. 1958 Feb 1;67(2):172–176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1958.00730010178007

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.